AIData.Broker

Median, middle half and range per comparable unit (per hour of video or audio, per image, per task, per company, per title, and more) for each kind of AI training data and each side of the market, computed from published prices. Without `kind`, returns every rate the evidence supports a median for.

The individual price observations behind the market rates: what a lab, vendor, marketplace or court said data was paid, offered, listed or sold for, with the figure as published, the figure per unit, the date, the source's own words and a link. Newest first.

What published prices imply for a holding of data: a low-to-high range in US dollars with the arithmetic behind it. Call it first with only `kind` to get the questions and their answer ids, ask the holder, then call again with `answers`. Questions not answered are taken at their defaults and marked as assumed. An indication, not an offer.

Organisations with a public way to sell them data, with their own published terms: what they want, what they pay, when they pay, who removes personal data, eligibility, and what they pay an introducer. Largest published figure first.

Vendors that sell training data, RL environments, evaluations, expert work or annotation to AI developers, each with what it says it sells and where its data comes from in its own words, and whether it says it pays holders for data. A to Z, not ranked.

Every lot publicly on offer in the catalogues the lot index reads each day (companies' records, codebases, footage, speech, environments), in one vocabulary: kind, industry, years of history, systems, size, what its catalogue says about the rights and whether it is ready, each linked to its catalogue's own page. We have not checked any catalogue's claims. No holder is named. Longest history first.

Licences of data to AI companies disclosed since July 2023: licensor, licensee, content, use (training or display), term, value where disclosed, with a verbatim quote and the source. Newest first.

Lawsuits, rulings, settlements and regulatory actions over data used to train AI, with parties, claim, amounts, outcome, status and the source. Newest first.

For a business system (Slack, Microsoft 365, Google Workspace, Salesforce, HubSpot, Zendesk, Zoom, GitHub, Notion and more): whether the holder can export its data, what the vendor's API terms say about training AI on data pulled through them, our reading of the content's rights risk, and the clauses word for word. Research from public sources, not legal advice. Without `system`, lists the systems

Every table behind these tools as a CSV and JSON download (our compilation of the tables under CC BY 4.0; quotes keep their sources' terms, and article text is not covered), with row counts, review dates and the permanent copies with their DOIs.